| by R. T. H. 
		HALSEY - an article from Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 1 (January 
		1916) 
 
			
				| (click on photos to enlarge image)
					 THE CLEARWATER COLLECTION OF COLONIAL SILVERAmerican Art -its expression by our painters, sculptors, and 
				craftsmen and the recognition of them by our people- was until 
				recent years handicapped by the belief that our art was of 
				recent growth and lacked the weight of history, tradition, and 
				inheritance, which in the minds of many seemed necessary for its 
				widespread recognition. This erroneous belief is fast becoming dissipated, largely 
				owing to the development of collections of American decorative 
				art by the Metropolitan, Boston, and Providence museums. Their 
				examples are being followed by the managements of other museums, 
				notably the Brooklyn Institute and some of our large western 
				museums. By these collections they are demonstrating that 
				artistic sentiment has long existed here and played an important 
				part in the early social life of our people.Colonial silver of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries 
				in its perfection of form, texture, and craftsmanship may be 
				studied in the Clearwater Collection, now located in Gallery 22 
				on the second floor. All the pieces in this collection -the 
				result of years of patient gathering by Judge A. T. Clearwater- 
				were made in America, and with few exceptions are the work of 
				native-born Americans who had learned their trade in this 
				country. No student of American art and the development of 
				artistic taste in this country can fail to recognize the work 
				and influence of our early silversmiths, their artistic 
				conception and superb craftsmanship. Their handicraft is the 
				earliest expression we have of our forefathers’ appreciation of 
				the beautiful, an appreciation which became widespread as the 
				country prospered and furnished a steadily increasing patronage, 
				which encouraged a succession of craftsmen, whose works assisted 
				to beautify our American homes and today bear silent witness to 
				the artistic tastes and desires of many whose descendants now 
				people our great republic.Half a century before the time when the first portrait 
				painter ventured to Boston (1701) -and was permitted to enter 
				only after giving bond "to Save the town Harmless"- silversmiths 
				prospered there, and one hundred years before Copley first gave 
				us his portraiture of our colonial aristocracy, many of the 
				communion tables of our churches were supplied with silver 
				vessels of local manufacture, whose charm and workmanship seem 
				impossible of reproduction today.
 The methods of these early American silversmiths were far 
				removed from those of the craftsmen of the twentieth century: 
				often their work was done in their homes instead of in shops 
				with glittering showcases. They received from our ancestors coin 
				which had been brought in from the West Indies in payment for 
				the products of fisheries, forest, and farms; this after being 
				weighed and receipted for, was melted into ingots, hammered into 
				sheets, welded into various forms, and returned to the original 
				owner -upon payment of charges for fashioning- in the form of 
				vessels for use on the dining table, where they shimmered and 
				shone in sun-and-candle-and fire-light and thereby furnished the 
				first and only joyous note to the none too cozy atmosphere of 
				our early ancestral homes.
					
						
							| The equipment of a well-established 
							seventeenth-century English silversmith and the 
							processes of manufacture are well i llustrated in 
							the reproduction of an engraving which served as a 
							frontispiece for "A new Touchstone For Gold and 
							Silver Wares", published in London in 1679. 
							 |  No art exhibition held in this city so instantly influenced 
				and directed an understanding of our early artistic 
				accomplishments as the Hudson-Fulton Exhibition held at the 
				Museum in 1909. It is not too much to say that it brought 
				prominently into the regular channels of commerce colonial and 
				Georgian art by making possible a widespread appreciation of it. 
				Queen Anne, Chippendale, Hepplewhite, and Sheraton pieces, which 
				had hitherto lurked in the windows of the antique shops of the 
				side streets, immediately appeared (and have since remained) in 
				the show windows of our palatial shops on the Avenue. Silver 
				plate of the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century forms has since 
				decorated the showcases of our great silver shops. All 
				interested in American craftsmanship have noted the influence of 
				this exhibition upon our craftsmen who work in metal.
 That same rare inspiration and opportunity for careful scrutiny 
				and study, hitherto given to our designers and decorators by the 
				Departments of Decorative Arts of the Museum and Cooper Union, 
				can now through the Clearwater Collection be supplied to those 
				who work in silver. The collection is of the period when ancient 
				geometrical shapes held sway among craftsmen; when purity of 
				form, sense of proportion, and perfection of line were preferred 
				to elaborateness of design; when dignity and solidity were 
				considered superior to bulk; and when the plain, polished 
				surface of the beautiful white metal was allowed to take its 
				color note from its surroundings rather than to serve as a 
				medium for the display of skill by craftsmen. Judge Clearwater’s 
				loan also includes a few pieces of our nineteenth-century plate, 
				which well illustrate the decadence of the art of the 
				silversmith during that atrocious period of craftsmanship known 
				as the Victorian Era.
The collection, which has been constantly added to, has just 
				been rearranged, and now for the first time it is easy for 
				students to study the chronological development of our early 
				styles and fashions. The work of each maker has been grouped, 
				thereby making it possible in many cases to identify the 
				personal touches in manufacture so peculiar to our early 
				craftsmen. The descriptive labels, which accompany each piece, 
				bear facsimile drawings of the maker’s mark, a feature not found 
				in previous exhibitions of old plate.Pen and camera are inadequate to its proper description. The 
				subtleties of texture and light and shade baffle reproduction; 
				every piece of hollow ware has its own individuality of size, 
				form, texture, and color. The exactness and precision of the 
				stock pattern of today fortunately are lacking. Personality 
				predominates.
					
						
							|  |  |  
							| Cup by unknown maker  | Plate by Samuel Minott  |  All the pieces are rare and many are unique; while in 
				general lines they follow the fashion and forms of old England, 
				certain of them show charming individuality of shape and 
				decorative motive not found in the plate made in Europe.The collection contains over one hundred and forty beautiful 
				pieces of hollow ware. Its completeness enables an exhaustive 
				study of the chronological development of the various forms of 
				beakers, tankards, porringers, mugs, and teapots, and various 
				other articles used upon the table. Spoons, sugar tongs, etc., 
				are to be found in great abundance. In fact, an exhaustive 
				catalogue of the collection would form a textbook of American 
				silver and its makers.
					
						|  | The collection is especially rich in the work of the 
						silversmiths who lived in Boston during the later part 
						of the seventeenth and the early years of the eighteenth 
						century. These have a greatly added interest in that 
						they are the work of men, all of whom took a prominent 
						part in the development of New England -its resources 
						and democracy.The wondrous life stories of many of the makers of these 
						pieces of American silver have already been told in the 
						lengthy historical introductions of the catalogues of 
						loan exhibitions held in the Boston (1906) and 
						Metropolitan Museums (1911). Enough has already been 
						written to give us an insight into the histories, 
						personalities, and environment of these early colonial 
						craftsmen and to make these examples of their handiwork 
						very personal and almost human. It is not the purpose of 
						this article of appreciation of the results of Judge 
						Clearwater's collecting to retell these tales.
 Probably to many the most fascinating piece in the 
						collection is a teapot of wonderful texture and color 
						made by John Coney (1655-1722) of Boston, who it will be 
						remembered engraved the plates for the first paper money 
						used in America. The coat of arms it bears testifies to 
						this early American engraver's skill with his engraving 
						tools. It is the earliest American teapot of which we 
						know. A tankard and a porringer by the same maker are 
						noteworthy pieces.
 |  
						| Teapot by John Coney (1655-1722) |  |  
					
						| Judge Clearwater has been extraordinarily fortunate 
						in securing four remarkable pieces bearing the mark of 
						Edward Winslow (1669-1753), also of Boston, whose work 
						entitles him to be recorded as the greatest of our 
						colonial silversmiths. He was an American, the grandson 
						of the John Winslow who came over in the Fortune in 
						1623, and on his mother's side was a direct descendant 
						of Anne Hutchinson -that goodly dame whose life figured 
						so largely in early New England and New York history.
						Winslow, in common with almost all of our 
						early silversmiths, was very prominent in the civic life 
						of the community. He served successively as constable, 
						tithing-man, surveyor, overseer of the poor, selectman, 
						and sheriff of Suffolk County (1728-43); from this 
						office he was appointed Judge of the Inferior Court of 
						Common Pleas. Defense in those days was not the neglected problem 
						it is today. In 1702 he was second lieutenant in the 
						artillery company and in 1714 its captain; he was major 
						of the Boston regiment in 1729 and its colonel in 1733. 
						The elaborately wrought chocolate pot and beautifully 
						fashioned plate illustrated herewith, and two tankards 
						demonstrate the very high order of his craftsmanship.
 |  |  
						|  | Plate by Edward Winslow (1669-1753) |  William Cowell (1682-1736) is represented by a porringer. It 
				is the same Cowell thus referred to by Samuel Sewall under date 
				of June 21,1707: "Billy Cowell’s shop is entered by the chimney 
				and a considerable quantity of plate was stolen. "John Dixwell (1680-1725), the son of the "regicide, " Col. 
				John Dixwell, who found an asylum in America and lived in 
				retirement in New Haven, is another of these early 
				eighteenth-century silversmiths whose work may be viewed in the 
				collection. John Burt (1691-1745) was the maker of the splendid brazier 
				illustrated below. Of equal interest is the work of his son 
				Benjamin Burt (1729-1804). 
					
						
							|  |  
							| Brazier by John Burt (1691-1745)  |  
					
						| The work of the Reveres, father and son, is also 
						well represented. The father, a Huguenot boy, served his 
						apprenticeship under Coney; the son, the patriot and 
						messenger of prerevolutionary days, was only nineteen 
						years old when his father died and left him to carry on 
						the trade which he had so successfully developed. 
 The exquisite teapot of the period of 1790, illustrated 
						on the right, has aesthetic qualities which demonstrate 
						Revere's artistic excellence.
 
 
 |  |  
						|  | Teapot by Paul Revere (1735-1818) |  
					
						|  | Salem, Providence, Newport, and Philadelphia have 
						contributed to this splendid collection. New York is adequately represented.
 
 A splendid coffee pot of the middle of the eighteenth 
						century, fashioned by Pygan Adams of New London, 
						indicates that superb craftsmanship flourished outside 
						of the confines of our largest cities.
 
 |  
						| Coffee pot by Pygan Adams (1712-1776) |  |  Undoubtedly, the most beautiful piece of New York silver in 
				the collection is a beaker made by some late seventeenth-century 
				Knickerbocker silversmith. Its makership cannot be identified, 
				however, owing to the partial obliteration of the maker’s mark. 
				It is a form greatly in vogue among our early New York 
				silversmiths, whose work as a rule followed closely the 
				conventional forms and decorations of the Dutch silversmiths. 
				This same Dutch influence is found in many examples of English 
				plate of the sixteenth century; in form and ornament, the beaker 
				closely resembles a London beaker bearing the date-letter of the 
				year 1599.To all Americans who rejoice in the stories of our country’s 
				past -its ideals and its struggles to maintain them- and to all 
				jealously apprehensive of our country’s future -endangered by 
				isms and political nostrums- this ancient silver of Judge 
				Clearwater must have an added charm which no foreign plate can 
				possibly possess; for it represents the work and personalities 
				of men who gave to the country the best they possessed in the 
				form of service to church and state and thereby assisted in the 
				gradual moulding and welding together of the various integral 
				units of colonial life into the great republic of which we are 
				so proud and whose traditions we hold so dear.
					
						
							|  |  |  |  |  
							| Beaker, New York 17th century
 | Mug by John Dixwell(1680-1725)
 | Chocolate pot by Edward Winslow (1669-1753)
 | Mug by Kaiser Griselm (late 17th century)
 |  
					
						| R. T. H. HALSEYThis article was firstly published in Metropolitan 
						Museum of Art Bulletin 1 (January 1916)
 |  |  |